Stop Wasting Money on Leadership Interventions That Don’t Work!
We help construction, engineering, and manufacturing organisations fix the real leadership challenge, once and for all.
Used by high-pressure teams where safety, performance, and accountability can't be left to chance.
Why Leadership Challenges Keep Resurfacing
Persistent people issues are rarely the result of poor leadership intent.
They are more often the result of inconsistent leadership under sustained pressure.
From the executive perspective, leadership intent remains sound. Decisions feel clear. Direction appears unchanged.
Elsewhere in the organisation, leadership is experienced differently.
Persistent people issues are rarely the result of poor leadership intent.
They are more often the result of inconsistent leadership under sustained pressure.
From the executive perspective, leadership intent remains sound. Decisions feel clear. Direction appears unchanged.
Elsewhere in the organisation, leadership is experienced differently.
One area experiences direction.
Another experiences tolerance.
Another experiences withdrawal.
Over time, this inconsistency creates confusion, frustration, and risk, even though leadership intent has not changed.
This is why organisations often find themselves addressing the same leadership challenges repeatedly, even after intervention.
Why Leadership Interventions Often Fail
Leadership interventions rarely fail because they are poorly designed.
They fail because they are introduced too early.
When leadership issues persist, pressure to act builds quickly.
Doing something feels responsible. Waiting can feel risky.
In response, organisations often turn to familiar, visible solutions: leadership training, coaching, or culture initiatives. In the right conditions, these can be effective.
The problem arises when action is taken before there is clarity on what is actually happening across the leadership system.
Without that clarity, organisations are often intervening:
At the wrong level.
In the wrong place.
Or for the wrong reason.
The result is predictable.
Interventions appear to work briefly. Behaviours shift. Language changes.
But the underlying patterns remain.
Months later, the same issues resurface, often described as a lack of follow-through or inconsistent application.
This is not a failure of the intervention. It is a failure of sequencing.
When action precedes understanding, effort increases but impact does not.
A Different Starting Point Before Intervention
A different starting point does not require immediate action.
It requires clarity.
Before deciding what to fix, develop, or change, leaders need a clear view of how leadership intent is currently being experienced across the organisation, particularly under pressure.
This is not about assessing individual leaders.
And it is not about judging capability.
It is about understanding where leadership impact has shifted, where consistency has weakened, and where pressure is unintentionally distorting behaviour.
With that understanding, decisions about intervention become proportionate, targeted, and far more likely to work.
The Pressure-Tested Leadership Review™
A different starting point does not require immediate action.
It requires clarity.
Before deciding what to fix, develop, or change, leaders need a clear view of how leadership intent is currently being experienced across the organisation, particularly under pressure.
This is not about assessing individual leaders. And it is not about judging capability.
It is about understanding where leadership impact has shifted, where consistency has weakened, and where pressure is unintentionally distorting behaviour.
With that understanding, decisions about intervention become proportionate, targeted, and far more likely to work.
What The Pressure-Tested Leadership Review™ Examines
The starting point for this work is the Pressure-Tested Leadership Review™.
This is a system-wide leadership diagnostic designed to support executive and board-level decision-making before intervention.
The Review examines:
How leadership intent is translated through different layers of the organisation.
Where leadership accountability becomes inconsistent under pressure.
How leadership signals are interpreted differently across teams, sites, or functions.
Where decision-making under pressure is creating unintended organisational risk.
Why people issues, safety concerns, or engagement problems continue to resurface.
Over time, repeated leadership inconsistency becomes organisational risk.
This Review is designed to surface that risk early, while it can still be addressed deliberately.
What Clarity Enables
With clarity:
Leadership intervention becomes proportionate, not reactive.
Action is taken at the right level of the organisation.
Senior leaders feel confident backing decisions.
Organisational risk is reduced, rather than redistributed.
Without that clarity, even well-intentioned leadership action can create new problems while attempting to resolve existing ones.
How the Review Works
The Pressure-Tested Leadership Review™ is deliberately contained and diagnostic in nature.
It is designed to create clarity without disruption, and without placing leaders in a defensive position.
At a high level, the Review involves:
Confidential leadership conversations focused on decision-making under pressure.
Review of relevant organisational context, signals, and feedback.
Identification of behavioural patterns shaping leadership impact across the system.
A clear written report outlining risks, root causes, and practical implications.
The Review does not introduce solutions, programmes, or change initiatives.
It provides leaders with the clarity required to decide if, where, and how intervention is needed.
Who the Review is For (and When it Isn’t)
The Pressure-Tested Leadership Review™ is designed for organisations where leadership decisions carry material operational, cultural, or reputational risk.
It works best when:
Leadership challenges are complex, persistent, or difficult to isolate.
Senior leaders recognise that intent is sound, but outcomes are inconsistent.
There is a genuine desire to understand what is happening before intervening.
HR and senior leadership need a defensible basis for decision-making.
Previous leadership or culture initiatives have not delivered lasting change.
The Review is not designed for organisations looking for immediate training, coaching, or culture programmes.
It is also not suitable where leadership issues are already clearly diagnosed and agreed, and the next step is execution.
In those situations, clarity already exists, and intervention is the right place to focus.
What Leaders Receive at the End of the Review
At the conclusion of the Pressure-Tested Leadership Review™, leaders receive a clear, structured view of how leadership is currently functioning across the organisation, particularly under pressure.
Specifically, the Review provides:
A written report detailing observed leadership patterns and systemic dynamics.
Clear articulation of where leadership intent and impact are misaligned.
Identification of behavioural risks affecting culture, performance, or safety.
Insight into where leadership consistency is weakening across levels or functions.
Practical implications for decision-making at executive and board level.
The Review does not prescribe solutions.
It equips leaders with the clarity required to decide what needs attention, where it sits, and what level of response is appropriate.
How Organisations Typically Use the Findings
Organisations use the findings of the Pressure-Tested Leadership Review™ in different ways, depending on what the clarity reveals.
In some cases, the Review confirms that existing leadership approaches are broadly sound, but require greater consistency or reinforcement at specific levels.
In others, it highlights targeted areas where leadership behaviour under pressure is creating unintended risk, allowing focused intervention rather than broad, disruptive action.
Common outcomes include:
Deciding whether intervention is required at all, and at what scale.
Prioritising where leadership attention and investment will have the greatest impact.
Resetting expectations around leadership accountability and decision-making.
Providing HR and senior leaders with a shared, evidence-based view of the problem.
Creating a clear basis for proportionate next steps.
The Review does not dictate what should happen next.
It ensures that whatever happens next is intentional, aligned, and grounded in reality.
Organisations We’ve Supported
Selected organisations that have used diagnostic-led approaches to understand leadership behaviour.
A Considered Next Step
If the patterns described here feel familiar, the appropriate next step is a short, exploratory conversation.
This is not a sales call.
It is an opportunity to discuss whether the Pressure-Tested Leadership Review™ would be useful in your context, and whether it is the right starting point given the challenges you are facing.
That conversation typically focuses on:
The nature of the leadership challenges you are seeing.
Where pressure is currently being felt most acutely.
Whether a diagnostic review would add clarity before action.
Scope, suitability, and practical considerations.
If the Review is not the right fit, that will be clear quickly.
No obligation. No expectation of follow-on work.
Accreditations
Accreditations and professional recognition that reflect commitment to evidence-based practice.
© One Degree Training & Coaching Ltd 2022-2026
Company No: 14053252 | VAT Reg No: GB 428 995 340
One Degree Training & Coaching Ltd is registered in The United Kingdom at One the Brayford, 20 Brayford Wharf North, LINCOLN, Lincolnshire, LN1 1BN